First responders handle emergencies around the clock – 24/7/365. As a result, the conventional 9-5 five-day week with every Saturday and Sunday off is a luxury not afforded to most in the profession. Many agencies maintain static schedules, where everyone works consistent shifts and “weekends”, though they may be permanently assigned to night shift and/or their weekends may be every Monday and Tuesday. By contrast, other agencies employ a rotating schedule which means their employees take turns alternating the hours, the days, or both.
There are advantages to either scenario, as well as obstacles. Rotating days can feel more fair, so certain workers aren’t permanently off on less desirable days of the week, such as Tuesday or Wednesday, while others are able to consistently enjoy Fridays. In a rotation, everyone alternates their work days in an established pattern, which could be more equitable. Rotating shifts are similar in that they distribute blocks of time evenly rather than days, so no one feels stuck working overnight shifts or other hours they may not enjoy.
Either of these rotating schedules can be an excellent method of encouraging equality and lead to higher levels of employee satisfaction, though it ultimately depends on how well they are implemented and the context of the unique agency. Generally speaking, some advantages that may come with a rotating schedule include:
However, with public safety scheduling nothing is ever simple, and it’s unfortunately common to jump into a rotating schedule for the perceived benefits without taking full account of the potential obstacles. In these cases, a rotating schedule can become challenging and confusing to manage – affecting managers and employees alike, ultimately having the opposite intended effect.
A few common pitfalls associated with rotating schedules include:
Before employing a rotating schedule, it’s important to consider the obstacles and weigh them against the anticipated benefits. The rotating schedule is often more difficult to manage, and if that becomes the case it may also cause a higher level of employee turnover. In some cases, a rotating schedule may be the best solution. In others, it may seem like the best solution though in practice it causes unnecessary complications.
This can be demonstrated in a hypothetical scenario which I encountered while working with a new client:
At a glance, there are some obvious advantages:
Payroll is able to process only 40 hours of work per week
Filling overtime is easier (if shift hours are not also rotated) because they’re eight-hour shifts
Everyone receives three-day weekends twice per rotation
Everyone gets two consecutive days off every week
However, there are some important disadvantages, too:
The weekends are always different, making planning in personal life difficult
There are five weeks where you get zero traditional weekend days off
The timing of the holidays will likely mean some people get very lucky and others get very, very unlucky
It puts employees in a position that virtually require shift trades in order to accommodate everyday life, which can lead to a high volume of requests for schedulers to track and process
More challenging to schedule and bid for vacations
It can be more difficult to schedule recurring things in personal life, such as childcare obligations or outside hobbies
Everyone now works six days in a row five out of seven weeks
This is just one example and in no way comprehensive, but it does aptly demonstrate the ability for any perceived advantages to quickly become overshadowed by disadvantages which may not be as obvious, but could adversely impact employee quality of life, agency operations, or both.
Ultimately, the right decision for your agency depends on your unique needs. Whether you are currently working with the SafeCities™ team or not, we’re happy to help you perform a self-evaluation to identify the optimal scheduling practices for your operations.