Developing a schedule to meet your agency’s unique needs 24/7/365 is no simple task – and while successfully doing so is an accomplishment worthy of recognition, there are still a few more steps before the finish line. While the final goal is implementation, one of the most important components is testing.
Testing a new schedule is essential, because it’s not uncommon for something to look one way on paper and a completely different way in practice. Committing fully to the transition without proper testing can lead to significant challenges that can pose a disruption at best, and create operational liabilities at worst.
When our team at SafeCities™ receives a request asking if and how an agency can test different schedule configuration, it’s typically for one of two reasons:
Understandably, the reason driving the desire for change is going to impact how we recommend testing.
By identifying why your agency desires a change, as specifically and detail-oriented as you possibly can, you’ll be much better equipped to establish specific goals and objectives which your new schedule must satisfy. If you just want something ‘better’, that will almost certainly be too abstract to help you reach your ideal outcome.
Additionally, take stock of what you and your employees enjoy most about your current schedule so that you can prioritize retaining those qualities. Identify departmental goals, but also ask employees about their individual goals to increase your chances of success.
Common examples include:
Most importantly, account for the necessary time to transition, including at least mid-term testing periods. It takes time for people to establish a genuine opinion of how the new schedule actually works, rather than carry-over opinions on how they thought the new schedule would work.
To get the most out of your testing period, do not test during your most ideal conditions – test during your least ideal conditions. Try to ensure the testing period spans a time when staffing is typically short, such as during the holidays or summer.
Create a de facto committee which includes front-line employees and not just supervisors. This ensures all levels of hierarchy have a voice at the table and feel heard – even (and especially) if not everyone gets their way. This step is too commonly skipped because it costs money or is perceived as an inconvenience to bring personnel in for a special project, and balance the associated disruptions. This is a ‘it costs money to save money’ situation, and the cost of doing this can be much greater: Employees may revolt if they don’t like how the new schedule disrupts their current one. Worst case, solicit input on a volunteer-only basis – you’ll likely be surprised at participation because people are invested in their well-being and how this will impact them.
First, determine your level of commitment:
Then, test for the appropriate amount of time. We encourage no fewer than two months, but six to 12 months would be ideal. Testing for a few weeks doesn’t give a comprehensive idea of what unforeseen obstacles could arise when you are changing the foundation of how your employees operate. Consider:
If you’re already working with the SafeCities™ team and are considering a change in how you schedule, this is something we can help with. Even if it’s just a brainstorming session – we are exposed to thousands of schedules across the country, and hear feedback from agencies everywhere on all manners of configurations. We have a lot of insight, and we’re here to help.